Someone Must Care

In today's Too Much Information age (see blog posting of April 14, 2009) TNB often wonders just who cares about the relentless amount of needless tidings which we are bombarded with daily in every sort of media, whether newspapers, television and radio, the Internet (including the ultimate trivia explosion--forwarded E-Mails) and so on.

Obviously, the purveyors of all the many examples of TMI care and believe others do--someone must care, right? It apparently really matters to some people that:

• Barack Obama marked down "African-American" on his census form. Although it is arguable that releasing this information was unnecessary, sure enough, there was consternation that he didn't check the "multiracial" box. If you really care about this, TNB says "get a life" (in any hue).
• Jesse James (who TNB remembers from long-ago Wild West movies--or is this a different guy?) admittedly cheated on his wife, brand-new Oscar winner Sandra Bullock, with some heavily tattooed bimbo --thus rising from obscurity to become the bigger story, especially for those whose lives are so empty that they care about this.
• Tiger Woods, who was considered the ultimate athletic role model until last Thanksgiving when he overdosed on cranberry sauce and wrecked his car (and his image), managed on the eve of his golf return at the Masters to give the breathless public a little window into his self inflicted anguish. Please tell TNB that most of those who care about this story do so because of a fanatic devotion to his sport (golf, that is).

Perhaps what these and countless other examples signify is that we all need a form of release from all the frightening real-life things we should care about, such as the size of the Federal and State deficits, Ahmed Karzai threatening to join the Taliban, the ever increasing earthquake activity, and scariest of all, the Chicago Cubs losing their opener 16-5.

April Fools Day

As part of his ongoing program to protect his readers from all sorts of nefarious activities (see: The Tea Party), TNB hereby gives everyone adequate warning of what could happen on April 1-if you're gullible enough to believe one of the many hoaxes or practical jokes that might be attempted. One certainly doesn't want to admit that he or she is an April Fool (or for that matter a fool on any other day).

Some of the all-time best pranks (courtesy of Wikipedia) include:

• The 1998 report that the Alabama legislature had voted to change the value of the mathematical constant pi.
• The 1996 New York Times ad by Taco Bell announcing that they had purchased the Liberty Bell and renamed it (what else) the Taco Liberty Bell.
• The famous 1957 BBC report showing Italians harvesting spaghetti from trees (having eradicated that horrible pest, the spaghetti weevil).
• The BBC (oh, those Brits!) in 1994 stating that Big Ben would go digital.
• Annual National Public Radio (NPR) announcements such as the 2008 report that the IRS was shipping consumer products instead of cash for tax rebates (actually, for many near-destitute States this might work)..

Sadly, all of these hoaxes were believed, at least for a short while, by a number of people who forgot what day it was. Although these poor souls quickly figured out what was real and what wasn't, in our society today we seem to have a lot of perpetual April Fools, who believe 24/7 in the most amazing things, such as:

• Sarah Palin
• Glenn Beck
• Celebrity Apprentice
• All of the "ask your doctor" drugs advertised on TV (most of which today seem to include suicide as a side effect)
• The honesty of the Karzai government in Afghanistan.
• The chance of the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series (TNB is the April Fool here!)

So beware on April 1st. If you've been made an April Fool (even temporaily) please don't let TNB know. He'll be embarrassed.

Armageddon

Armageddon is of course the site prophesied in the Bible where the end of time as we know it will occur. For years, the term has been used as a synonym or description for cataclysmic events. The specter of the fearful Armageddon has been recently significantly trivialized by a movie with that title (where the final battle occurs in 2012, or is that just the next presidential election?) and by using it to describe horrible weather, etc.

Thus, it should be no surprise that "enlightened" Republican leaders such as Michael Steele and John Boehner have described the recently passed health reform legislation as "Armageddon". Why not further create a poisonous atmosphere (causing numerous threats against Democratic legislators among other problems) and whip up the "unenlightened" masses into a Tea Party and Fox News Channel fueled frenzy over a piece of legislation that will likely do far more good than harm?

Let's look at just what is so awful that the aforementioned end of time must be fast approaching. Although there can be legitimate debate over the stipulation(effective four years from now!)that everyone must purchase health insurance, albeit possibly with Federal Government assistance, how can anyone seriously believe that all Americans should not have reasonable access to health care? And as to the immediate reining in of insurance company overreach (insurance for children with pre-existing conditions, lifting of caps on total payments, etc.) is it possible that the vehement opposition is not really on ideological grounds but is largely due to the "undue influence", to say the least, of industry lobbying efforts?

Although the (televised) behavior of certain members of Congress this past weekend explains that body's 17% approval rating, the public (other than those believing in Armageddon!) has not generally reacted negatively. Polls are positive, the stock market is calm, the NCAA tournament is moving along, the baseball season will open soon and although hard to believe to some, life goes on. The end of time is not yet here (just wait until Sarah Palin is elected President).

BTW--an ugly postscript to the legislative maneuvers has been the re-emergence of the use of the "abortion card" as the major item of significance, no matter what the merits of the bill. Despite language to the contrary in the legislation, so called "pro life" forces have emerged from dormancy (abortion rates are way down) to engage in the worst sort of fearmongering possible. How can this be the major issue for so many when this country is battling recession, constant and increasing threats of terrorism, lack of quality education and yes unevenly provided health care? The answer is obvious--it is emotional, not logical -- an apt description of the Armageddonites.

Fame

Two famous quotes, each relating to the meaning of fame, are of course:

1. "In the future, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes" attributed to Andy Warhol in 1968 [today, shortened to his/her 15 minutes of fame].
2. "Glory [updated to fame] is fleeting, obscurity is forever" attributed to Napoleon Boanaparte in the early 19th century.

These 2 maxims have never been more relevant than currently, when in part due to the information explosion (Internet, Twitter, Facebook, etc.) and the so-called 24/7 news cycle, it is far easier to get famous [maybe for slightly longer than 15 minutes] as well as also to lapse quickly into often well-deserved obscurity.

Take for example one Eric Massa, recently resigned (in disgrace) New York congressman. Massa embarrassed moronic right-wing commentator Glenn Beck on a live program by admitting that Massa's well-documented groping of five single male aides he lived with (!) had nothing to do with his disillusionment with President Obama's health care program, which Beck thought he was exposing (pun intended). Massa has been mercilessly and steadily lampooned by every comedian but does anyone believe that by the end of 2010 his 15 minutes of fame won't have turned into obscurity?

For that matter, whatever happened to the Salahis? Only 4 short months ago, this faux-society couple certainly had their 15 minutes when they crashed the White House State dinner honoring the Prime Minister of India. So far, they haven't been charged with any crime, but if they're "lucky" enough to have this happen, they could get another 15 minutes (or 15 months in jail?). Otherwise, it's obscurity and in the apt words of another old maxim, they will become (perhaps) a footnote to history.

So the next time someone new bursts on the scene, likely for some sort of notorious behavior, TNB advises you to write their name(s) down and keep them in a safe place so that you can remember them if you care to (???).

Oscar Night

The first ever Normal Blog appeared almost exactly two years ago (March 12, 2008) and was entitled "Movie Musings" reflecting TNB's life-long movie passion. It's no coincidence that a long ago Chicago movie theatre, the Normal, is prominently displayed. So on the eve of this year's Oscars some updated Movie Musings (and predictions) appear to be in order.

Will the hugely successful "Avatar" beat out the modest but gripping "Hurt Locker" for Best Picture? Since these 2 are directed, respectively, by ex-spouses James Cameron and Kathryn Bigelow, will Academy voters split their votes so one award goes to each? There is precedent with an occasional Best Director (e.g., the notorious Roman Polanski for "The Pianist") coming from a picture that did not win the top prize. A purist would argue that Best Picture automatically means Best Director, but as we all know, emotion plays a large part in the voting, so TNB predicts that Bigelow will get a very nice consolation prize, but "Avatar" will win the big one.

Speaking of emotion, long-time Hollywood insiders Jeff Bridges and Sandra Bullock are heavily favored to each win their first Oscars for "Crazy Heart" and "The Blind Side", two very average movies. Honestly, isn't it time that we stop taking Meryl Streep and her 16 nominations for granted and finally give her a 3rd Oscar for her scintillating turn as Julia Child in "Julie and Julia"? If she doesn't deserve Best Actress, TNB will eat 3 helpings of Child's very rich beef bourgignon.

Likewise, whatever happened to the Best Actor chances of George Clooney whose perfect depiction of a modern day corporate assassin in "Up in the Air" caused, among other things, a spike in the sale of wheeled, carry on suitcases? Also, in that movie, Anna Kendrick's wonderful performance as a smarmy technogeek has been overwhelmed by Mo'Nique, who has Best Supporting Actress sewed up for "Precious".

Finally, there's nothing like playing a Nazi to give an edge for any acting award--see Christof Waltz for Best Supporting Actor in "Inglourious Basterds", Quentin Tarantino's outrageous reimagining of an alternative (and satisfying) end to World War II.

By next week, this will all be a distant memory, but at least for TNB, Oscar Night is great fun. As an aside, venerable Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert (who is basically unable to eat, drink or speak) supposedly will be attending, which is a greater achievement than any of the foregoing examples of make believe.

Anybody Else Believe This ?

Besides TNB, does anybody else believe that:

• Sarah Palin and her Tea Party devotees (who recently paid her $100,000 to talk "hopey" and "changey" to them) are not strictly a fringe movement, to be easily dismissed? Apparently, between 25% and one-third of Americans really think she makes sense and therefore she and her movement are dangerous, not laughable. History says that she'll self-destruct by 2012, but don't count on it. The best antidote would of course be for President Obama to really turn this country around.
• Two months from now, less than 1% of Americans will not remember who won the moguls, biathlon, Nordic combined or snowboard cross at the Olympics? NBC has done a great job in making these rarely seen sports exciting but our attention span (never long) will inevitably turn to March Madness (college basketball and the Oscars!), American Idol, Opening Day and other rites of Spring.
• Speaking of NBC, Jay Leno's post-Olympics return to the Tonight Show will be a colossal flop (as will his replacements in prime time)? Viewing habits have changed so radically with fragmentation of options (including the Internet, I- Phones, Twitter, Facebook, etc.) that it is hard to imagine that the old TV paradigms will return (or should).
• The U.S. Senate is an ineffective, unresponsive legislative body? Between the campaign financing issues, pork, scandals, poor behavior and inertia (not to mention the archaic rules) how can anyone admire the savagely partisan members of this group. Too bad they're not all up for re-election this year. Of course, the entire House is and they're not much better.
• Toyota will never return to its position in the automobile market? The only way to repair the severely battered image is for Toyota to change its name to disassociate from the poor quality syndrome. TNB suggests say Edsel or CMW (China Motor Works) to bring back consumer confidence. No need to give thanks--just providing a public service.

The Blind Side

Many of the people who fancy themselves experts on the movie business, both within and outside of Hollywood, have been stunned by the huge financial success of The Blind Side which although receiving lukewarm reviews, has to date grossed $238 million vs. a modest cost of $35 million and even more surprisingly has garnered an Oscar nomination for Best Picture and a Best Actress nomination for Sandra Bullock, who is the early favorite to win. The reaction of "mainstream" America to a reasonably well made feel good movie, based on a compelling true story and containing a heavy dose of Southern high school football (with cameos from real college coaches) as well as a do gooder attitude should not be surprising. There even is an honest (and factual) recognition of the sleazy side of college recruiting.

Of course the term Blind Side as used here refers to the fact that quarterbacks are much more vulnerable to being hurt by onrushing defensive linemen from the side opposite the one they're usually facing when attempting to pass, which for right handed QB's is the left (or "blind") side. Thus, their major protectors, charged with covering such "blind side" are behemoths playing left tackle, a very important position and one in which of course the real life protagonist, Michael Oher, has excelled to the point where he starred in 2009 as an NFL rookie with the Baltimore Ravens, after an All American career at Ole Miss.

On the eve of that uniquely American cultural institution, Super Bowl Sunday, TNB can only think of how instructive the theme of this film should be to the very sports aware President Obama. Who is covering his Blind Side from the Tea Party rabble (biggest hero of which is Sarah Palin), the birthers, Fox News and others who are hell bent on wrecking his presidency no matter what the cost to the country? Of course, since he's left handed his biggest protection must come from the right side, which is pretty ironic.

Despite the overwhelming Democratic control of Congress, there doesn't seem to be much offensive football being played there with the majority always appearing to be on the defensive. Has there ever been a more ineffectual Senate Majority leader than Harry Reid? LBJ, where are you now that we need you? If the character played in the movie by Sandra Bullock wasn't an avowed Republican, TNB would call on her in a minute to kick some butt. Come to think of it she might anyway.